Have you attended NENA’s recent webinar on “Quality Assurance & Improving PSAP Call Taking”? Clearly, NENA sees, encourages and supports the progression of PSAP (Public Safety Answering Point) communications towards better standardization in communication protocols and procedures, backed by improved quality control that leads to timely improvements - before call taker knowledge gaps or procedural problems end up costing human lives. This was a great affirmation for many attendees of the webinar who already started this process or are preparing to get started. Indeed, our experience with hundreds of PSAPs around the nation and engagement in NENA’s NG9-1-1 partner program point towards the pressing need to rethink the way PSAP communication standards are implemented, communicated to employees, and enforced through Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Improvement (QI) processes.
A least 60% of PSAP centers have already wised up to the trend of objective and consistent quality monitoring of their emergency communications - they have implemented or are about to implement formalized QA and QI tools and processes. Has your agency joined this forward-thinking majority, or do you participate in the other 40%?
Successful PSAP Quality Assurance process does not really need to be expensive or painful to implement, even though some agencies still perceive financial and staffing constraints as delaying factors. Let’s take a closer look at these four signs of succcess:
1. Standards, protocols first – standardization of PSAP communications and information gathering procedures should always be the first step in the QA process, as that’s what you ultimately want to enforce. Apart from obvious gains in accuracy and efficiency in your emergency communications, the ability to demonstrate that you follow standard protocols will help you in a court room or in communications with general public or media. This approach also greatly helps with acceptance and cooperation of your PSAP employees – you will need everyone’s buy-in for the QA program to be successful. Agencies who do not have formalized protocols in place can either purchase a toolset that includes them or they may be able to learn from surrounding agencies who are more experienced in this area.
2. Communicate before you implement QA – without proper introduction to all PSAP employees where objectives, methods, and standards of the new QA process are explained, chances are rather high that the QA monitoring process will be seen as punitive, distracting, or otherwise negative. Open book approach is what works best – present the new program as a team effort and a source of timely help, appealing to the desire of emergency communicators to provide best possible service to citizens. After all, a vast majority of them applied for this job because they want to help people in need.
3. Align your QA & QI tools with standards and protocols – the notion that one size doesn’t fit all couldn’t be more pronounced in PSAP QA. Since different call types require different knowledge, protocols and attitudes, plan for a set of evaluation forms that are closely aligned with the requirements of different calls. For example, you wouldn’t want to evaluate a call where a domestic violence problem is reported by using a generalized police dispatch QA form, or a form that has a mindset of assisting a heart-attack victim. The latest QA software can be inexpensive yet powerful, allowing you to define any number of QA forms and then automatically associate those forms to the right call types. With VPI QALITY, you can even automate the selection of most important calls for evaluation, as those communications where human life is at stake require much closer attention than a cat in a tree problem.
4. Integrate Quality Improvement - consistent, objective QA evaluation is likely to uncover gaps in employee knowledge, consistency, or even procedural defects and will inevitably point towards opportunities for improvement. This works best when the improvement mechanism is directly integrated into the QA process. For example, VPI QUALITY call taker evaluation software can be set up to send alerts to supervisors about potential or actual problems that are serious enough to require timely personal attention. Call takers and dispatchers can be automatically notified about results of their evaluations (good-bye surprises long time after the call), along with automated, personalized selection of learning materials that will help them improve – without the need for personal meeting with a supervisor to discuss every minor problem. Employees will also appreciate timely recognition – when they earn a high QA score, you can have the system set up to send them a congratulatory message immediately. Top achievers can and should be recognized publically – you can broadcast this information through automated, built-in processes as well.
By now, you may be thinking: “great, but this looks like it will take a lot of work and money.” The good news is that you don’t have to buy much hardware, software and invest a great deal of your own time to get your QA/QI program off the ground. Look into special incentives offered by QA vendors like VPI in 2012. And did you know that it is now available as a third-party service? Something to consider, even if you intend to be on your own at some point in the future. With a QA service engagement, you will gain a great deal of know-how, which will prove to be rather helpful in planning your next steps.

It’s the sound all motorists dread. The click, click, silence that we all know is the sound of a completely dead battery. Stuck on the side of the road, late to work and sitting in your driveway, or stranded in a parking lot somewhere. Just waiting for some kind soul to come by with jumper cables and give you a boost.
Just like a home that sometimes needs to be refreshed, traditional quality assurance has reached a fork in the road of its 30-year life. Now's the perfect time to re-evaluate the way we monitor and measure our call center agents and “cleaning house” in the Quality Assurance (QA) department to make room for analytics-oriented QA tools and best practices. By implementing this makeover in your contact center, you can radically reduce manual steps required by most QA applications by more than 60 percent. And, who among us can’t use 60% less manual work?









So many of our customers today are conducting business over the phone, which frequently includes processing credit card transactions. We all know how crucial it is to keep that personal data safe and secure – protecting the identities of the buyers and the reputation of the companies taking their sensitive information.
Credit unions and community banks are increasingly coping with federal and local legislation, interest rate hikes and volatility in capital markets, all of which entails placing greater emphasis on local and regional customer retention, quality assurance, internal controls, as well as more careful compliance and risk management. Although these smaller banks share many common challenges with large contact centers, they have unique needs that can be addressed using today’s modular, highly customizable call quality monitoring and workforce optimization solutions. 
Are you interested in keeping up-to-date on the latest developments in contact center call recording, quality monitoring, analytics, performance management or eLearning technologies?
The contact center business can be a tricky one when it comes to motivating and praising agents. It’s a sentiment that was widely recognized and shared at the 2010 Quality Assurance and Training Connection (QATC) Annual Conference in Nashville, Tennessee. I had the pleasure of attending and sponsoring this exceptional 3-day, information-packed event where we exchanged ideas and shared best practices with over 150 Call Center Quality Assurance and Training professionals.




